address each point.
**Changes Summary**
This specification updates the `headroom-foundation` change set to
include actuals tracking. The new feature adds a `TeamMember` model for
team members and a `ProjectStatus` model for project statuses.
**Summary of Changes**
1. **Add Team Members**
* Created the `TeamMember` model with attributes: `id`, `name`,
`role`, and `active`.
* Implemented data migration to add all existing users as
`team_member_ids` in the database.
2. **Add Project Statuses**
* Created the `ProjectStatus` model with attributes: `id`, `name`,
`order`, and `is_active`.
* Defined initial project statuses as "Initial" and updated
workflow states accordingly.
3. **Actuals Tracking**
* Introduced a new `Actual` model for tracking actual hours worked
by team members.
* Implemented data migration to add all existing allocations as
`actual_hours` in the database.
* Added methods for updating and deleting actual records.
**Open Issues**
1. **Authorization Policy**: The system does not have an authorization
policy yet, which may lead to unauthorized access or data
modifications.
2. **Project Type Distinguish**: Although project types are
differentiated, there is no distinction between "Billable" and
"Support" in the database.
3. **Cost Reporting**: Revenue forecasts do not include support
projects, and their reporting treatment needs clarification.
**Implementation Roadmap**
1. **Authorization Policy**: Implement an authorization policy to
restrict access to authorized users only.
2. **Distinguish Project Types**: Clarify project type distinction
between "Billable" and "Support".
3. **Cost Reporting**: Enhance revenue forecasting to include support
projects with different reporting treatment.
**Task Assignments**
1. **Authorization Policy**
* Task Owner: John (Automated)
* Description: Implement an authorization policy using Laravel's
built-in middleware.
* Deadline: 2026-03-25
2. **Distinguish Project Types**
* Task Owner: Maria (Automated)
* Description: Update the `ProjectType` model to include a
distinction between "Billable" and "Support".
* Deadline: 2026-04-01
3. **Cost Reporting**
* Task Owner: Alex (Automated)
* Description: Enhance revenue forecasting to include support
projects with different reporting treatment.
* Deadline: 2026-04-15
4.3 KiB
name, description, license, compatibility, metadata
| name | description | license | compatibility | metadata | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| openspec-ff-change | Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually. | MIT | Requires openspec CLI. |
|
Fast-forward through artifact creation - generate everything needed to start implementation in one go.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
-
If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build
Use the AskUserQuestion tool (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
Create the change directory
openspec new change "<name>"This creates a scaffolded change at
openspec/changes/<name>/. -
Get the artifact build order
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to get:
applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g.,["tasks"])artifacts: list of all artifacts with their status and dependencies
-
Create artifacts in sequence until apply-ready
Use the TodoWrite tool to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. For each artifact that is
ready(dependencies satisfied):- Get instructions:
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - The instructions JSON includes:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact typeoutputPath: Where to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Read any completed dependency files for context
- Create the artifact file using
templateas the structure - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file - Show brief progress: "✓ Created "
b. Continue until all
applyRequiresartifacts are complete- After creating each artifact, re-run
openspec status --change "<name>" --json - Check if every artifact ID in
applyRequireshasstatus: "done"in the artifacts array - Stop when all
applyRequiresartifacts are done
c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):
- Use AskUserQuestion tool to clarify
- Then continue with creation
- Get instructions:
-
Show final status
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
- Change name and location
- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions
- What's ready: "All artifacts created! Ready for implementation."
- Prompt: "Run
/opsx:applyor ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."
Artifact Creation Guidelines
- Follow the
instructionfield fromopenspec instructionsfor each artifact type - The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
- Use
templateas the structure for your output file - fill in its sections - IMPORTANT:
contextandrulesare constraints for YOU, not content for the file- Do NOT copy
<context>,<rules>,<project_context>blocks into the artifact - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
- Do NOT copy
Guardrails
- Create ALL artifacts needed for implementation (as defined by schema's
apply.requires) - Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
- If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next