Santhosh Janardhanan
f87ccccc4d
address each point.
**Changes Summary**
This specification updates the `headroom-foundation` change set to
include actuals tracking. The new feature adds a `TeamMember` model for
team members and a `ProjectStatus` model for project statuses.
**Summary of Changes**
1. **Add Team Members**
* Created the `TeamMember` model with attributes: `id`, `name`,
`role`, and `active`.
* Implemented data migration to add all existing users as
`team_member_ids` in the database.
2. **Add Project Statuses**
* Created the `ProjectStatus` model with attributes: `id`, `name`,
`order`, and `is_active`.
* Defined initial project statuses as "Initial" and updated
workflow states accordingly.
3. **Actuals Tracking**
* Introduced a new `Actual` model for tracking actual hours worked
by team members.
* Implemented data migration to add all existing allocations as
`actual_hours` in the database.
* Added methods for updating and deleting actual records.
**Open Issues**
1. **Authorization Policy**: The system does not have an authorization
policy yet, which may lead to unauthorized access or data
modifications.
2. **Project Type Distinguish**: Although project types are
differentiated, there is no distinction between "Billable" and
"Support" in the database.
3. **Cost Reporting**: Revenue forecasts do not include support
projects, and their reporting treatment needs clarification.
**Implementation Roadmap**
1. **Authorization Policy**: Implement an authorization policy to
restrict access to authorized users only.
2. **Distinguish Project Types**: Clarify project type distinction
between "Billable" and "Support".
3. **Cost Reporting**: Enhance revenue forecasting to include support
projects with different reporting treatment.
**Task Assignments**
1. **Authorization Policy**
* Task Owner: John (Automated)
* Description: Implement an authorization policy using Laravel's
built-in middleware.
* Deadline: 2026-03-25
2. **Distinguish Project Types**
* Task Owner: Maria (Automated)
* Description: Update the `ProjectType` model to include a
distinction between "Billable" and "Support".
* Deadline: 2026-04-01
3. **Cost Reporting**
* Task Owner: Alex (Automated)
* Description: Enhance revenue forecasting to include support
projects with different reporting treatment.
* Deadline: 2026-04-15
4.3 KiB
name, description, category, tags
| name | description | category | tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPSX: Sync | Sync delta specs from a change to main specs | Workflow |
|
Sync delta specs from a change to main specs.
This is an agent-driven operation - you will read delta specs and directly edit main specs to apply the changes. This allows intelligent merging (e.g., adding a scenario without copying the entire requirement).
Input: Optionally specify a change name after /opsx:sync (e.g., /opsx:sync add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
If no change name provided, prompt for selection
Run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes. Use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select.Show changes that have delta specs (under
specs/directory).IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
-
Find delta specs
Look for delta spec files in
openspec/changes/<name>/specs/*/spec.md.Each delta spec file contains sections like:
## ADDED Requirements- New requirements to add## MODIFIED Requirements- Changes to existing requirements## REMOVED Requirements- Requirements to remove## RENAMED Requirements- Requirements to rename (FROM:/TO: format)
If no delta specs found, inform user and stop.
-
For each delta spec, apply changes to main specs
For each capability with a delta spec at
openspec/changes/<name>/specs/<capability>/spec.md:a. Read the delta spec to understand the intended changes
b. Read the main spec at
openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md(may not exist yet)c. Apply changes intelligently:
ADDED Requirements:
- If requirement doesn't exist in main spec → add it
- If requirement already exists → update it to match (treat as implicit MODIFIED)
MODIFIED Requirements:
- Find the requirement in main spec
- Apply the changes - this can be:
- Adding new scenarios (don't need to copy existing ones)
- Modifying existing scenarios
- Changing the requirement description
- Preserve scenarios/content not mentioned in the delta
REMOVED Requirements:
- Remove the entire requirement block from main spec
RENAMED Requirements:
- Find the FROM requirement, rename to TO
d. Create new main spec if capability doesn't exist yet:
- Create
openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md - Add Purpose section (can be brief, mark as TBD)
- Add Requirements section with the ADDED requirements
-
Show summary
After applying all changes, summarize:
- Which capabilities were updated
- What changes were made (requirements added/modified/removed/renamed)
Delta Spec Format Reference
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: New Feature
The system SHALL do something new.
#### Scenario: Basic case
- **WHEN** user does X
- **THEN** system does Y
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Existing Feature
#### Scenario: New scenario to add
- **WHEN** user does A
- **THEN** system does B
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: Deprecated Feature
## RENAMED Requirements
- FROM: `### Requirement: Old Name`
- TO: `### Requirement: New Name`
Key Principle: Intelligent Merging
Unlike programmatic merging, you can apply partial updates:
- To add a scenario, just include that scenario under MODIFIED - don't copy existing scenarios
- The delta represents intent, not a wholesale replacement
- Use your judgment to merge changes sensibly
Output On Success
## Specs Synced: <change-name>
Updated main specs:
**<capability-1>**:
- Added requirement: "New Feature"
- Modified requirement: "Existing Feature" (added 1 scenario)
**<capability-2>**:
- Created new spec file
- Added requirement: "Another Feature"
Main specs are now updated. The change remains active - archive when implementation is complete.
Guardrails
- Read both delta and main specs before making changes
- Preserve existing content not mentioned in delta
- If something is unclear, ask for clarification
- Show what you're changing as you go
- The operation should be idempotent - running twice should give same result