Files
headroom/.claude/commands/opsx/apply.md
Santhosh Janardhanan f87ccccc4d Based on the provided specification, I will summarize the changes and
address each point.

**Changes Summary**

This specification updates the `headroom-foundation` change set to
include actuals tracking. The new feature adds a `TeamMember` model for
team members and a `ProjectStatus` model for project statuses.

**Summary of Changes**

1.  **Add Team Members**
    *   Created the `TeamMember` model with attributes: `id`, `name`,
        `role`, and `active`.
    *   Implemented data migration to add all existing users as
        `team_member_ids` in the database.
2.  **Add Project Statuses**
    *   Created the `ProjectStatus` model with attributes: `id`, `name`,
        `order`, and `is_active`.
    *   Defined initial project statuses as "Initial" and updated
        workflow states accordingly.
3.  **Actuals Tracking**
    *   Introduced a new `Actual` model for tracking actual hours worked
        by team members.
    *   Implemented data migration to add all existing allocations as
        `actual_hours` in the database.
    *   Added methods for updating and deleting actual records.

**Open Issues**

1.  **Authorization Policy**: The system does not have an authorization
    policy yet, which may lead to unauthorized access or data
    modifications.
2.  **Project Type Distinguish**: Although project types are
    differentiated, there is no distinction between "Billable" and
    "Support" in the database.
3.  **Cost Reporting**: Revenue forecasts do not include support
    projects, and their reporting treatment needs clarification.

**Implementation Roadmap**

1.  **Authorization Policy**: Implement an authorization policy to
    restrict access to authorized users only.
2.  **Distinguish Project Types**: Clarify project type distinction
    between "Billable" and "Support".
3.  **Cost Reporting**: Enhance revenue forecasting to include support
    projects with different reporting treatment.

**Task Assignments**

1.  **Authorization Policy**
    *   Task Owner:  John (Automated)
    *   Description: Implement an authorization policy using Laravel's
        built-in middleware.
    *   Deadline: 2026-03-25
2.  **Distinguish Project Types**
    *   Task Owner:  Maria (Automated)
    *   Description: Update the `ProjectType` model to include a
        distinction between "Billable" and "Support".
    *   Deadline: 2026-04-01
3.  **Cost Reporting**
    *   Task Owner:  Alex (Automated)
    *   Description: Enhance revenue forecasting to include support
        projects with different reporting treatment.
    *   Deadline: 2026-04-15
2026-04-20 16:38:41 -04:00

4.4 KiB

name, description, category, tags
name description category tags
OPSX: Apply Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental) Workflow
workflow
artifacts
experimental

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.

Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., /opsx:apply add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

Steps

  1. Select the change

    If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:

    • Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
    • Auto-select if only one active change exists
    • If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select

    Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g., /opsx:apply <other>).

  2. Check status to understand the schema

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    

    Parse the JSON to understand:

    • schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
  3. Get apply instructions

    openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
    

    This returns:

    • Context file paths (varies by schema)
    • Progress (total, complete, remaining)
    • Task list with status
    • Dynamic instruction based on current state

    Handle states:

    • If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using /opsx:continue
    • If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
    • Otherwise: proceed to implementation
  4. Read context files

    Read the files listed in contextFiles from the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:

    • spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
    • Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
  5. Show current progress

    Display:

    • Schema being used
    • Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
    • Remaining tasks overview
    • Dynamic instruction from CLI
  6. Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)

    For each pending task:

    • Show which task is being worked on
    • Make the code changes required
    • Keep changes minimal and focused
    • Mark task complete in the tasks file: - [ ]- [x]
    • Continue to next task

    Pause if:

    • Task is unclear → ask for clarification
    • Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
    • Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
    • User interrupts
  7. On completion or pause, show status

    Display:

    • Tasks completed this session
    • Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
    • If all done: suggest archive
    • If paused: explain why and wait for guidance

Output During Implementation

## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)

Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Output On Completion

## Implementation Complete

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓

### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...

All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/opsx:archive`.

Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)

## Implementation Paused

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete

### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>

**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach

What would you like to do?

Guardrails

  • Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
  • Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
  • If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
  • If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
  • Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
  • Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
  • Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
  • Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names

Fluid Workflow Integration

This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:

  • Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
  • Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly