77 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
77 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# Product Assessment: Privacy Policy Analyzer
|
|
|
|
## What's Good
|
|
1. Clear Value Proposition: Privacy policies are notoriously unreadable - an AI-powered analyzer fills a real gap
|
|
2. Differentiation: ToS;DR focuses on Terms of Service; you're targeting privacy policies specifically - a narrower, more focused scope
|
|
3. Scoring System: A-E grading is intuitive and actionable for users
|
|
4. Practical Inputs: Admin page + env file approach is simple and effective
|
|
|
|
## Key Concerns & Recommendations
|
|
1. AI Reliability & Consistency
|
|
- ChatGPT outputs can vary between runs
|
|
- Recommendation: Implement structured output (JSON mode) with strict schemas, add confidence scores per finding, and consider human review workflow for disputed assessments
|
|
2. Legal Liability
|
|
- AI might misinterpret legal text
|
|
- Recommendation: Add prominent disclaimers ("AI-generated analysis, not legal advice"), implement a "flag for review" feature, and consider peer-review system like ToS;DR's
|
|
3. Scoring Parameters Definition
|
|
- Need transparent, weighted criteria
|
|
- Recommendation: Define categories like:
|
|
- Data collection scope (what's collected)
|
|
- Data sharing (3rd parties, purposes)
|
|
- User rights (deletion, portability, opt-out)
|
|
- Retention periods
|
|
- Tracking methods
|
|
- Security measures mentioned
|
|
4. Policy Updates
|
|
- Privacy policies change frequently
|
|
- Recommendation: Store historical versions, show "last analyzed" dates, and implement automated re-analysis triggers
|
|
5. Additional Features to Consider
|
|
- Browser extension for quick checks while browsing
|
|
- Comparison tool (compare 2+ services side-by-side)
|
|
- Export/shareable reports
|
|
- API for developers
|
|
- RSS feed for policy changes
|
|
|
|
## MVP Features:
|
|
1. Admin interface to add services (name + privacy policy URL/text)
|
|
2. ChatGPT-powered analysis with structured JSON output
|
|
3. A-E grading with breakdown
|
|
4. Public-facing service listing and detail pages
|
|
5. Basic search/filter
|
|
|
|
## Nice-to-Haves (post-MVP):
|
|
- GDPR/CCPA specific tags
|
|
- Policy change detection/version history
|
|
- Simple browser extension
|
|
- Comparison view
|
|
|
|
## Technical Decisions Needed
|
|
|
|
Before I create a plan, let me know your preferences:
|
|
1. Tech Stack: Any preference? (e.g., Next.js + Vercel, Python/Flask, Node/Express, etc.)
|
|
2. Database: SQLite for simplicity, or PostgreSQL?
|
|
3. Hosting: Vercel, Railway, self-hosted?
|
|
4. Frontend: Simple server-rendered pages, or React SPA?
|
|
5. OpenAI Model: GPT-4 for accuracy or GPT-3.5 for cost savings?
|
|
|
|
## Technical Architecture Plan
|
|
### Stack:
|
|
- Runtime: Bun (Javascript)
|
|
- Database: PostgreSQL (via postgres or bun:sqlite if you want to start simpler)
|
|
- Search: Meilisearch
|
|
- Cache: Redis
|
|
- Templating: EJS or simple HTML string templates
|
|
- AI: OpenAI API (GPT-4o or GPT-4-turbo)
|
|
|
|
### Key Design Decisions:
|
|
1. Database Schema - Services table, Analysis results table, Policy versions table
|
|
2. AI Prompt Engineering - Structured JSON output for consistent scoring
|
|
3. Caching Strategy - Redis for API responses, Meilisearch for full-text search
|
|
4. Deployment - Docker Compose for easy self-hosting
|
|
|
|
Non-functional requirements
|
|
|
|
1. Search Engine Optimization (in-page tags and keywords, sitemap.xml etc.)
|
|
2. Performance benchmarking
|
|
3. Security standards.
|
|
4. WCAG compliance WCAG 2.1 AA. |